Skip to content


Brown Vs. Ketch - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number369 U.S. 423
AppellantBrown
RespondentKetch
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of new jersey. no. 751. decided april 16, 1962. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. mr. justice frankfurter and mr. justice white took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 369 u.s. 423, 424 general finance corp. v. archetto, 369 u.s. 423 (1962) 369 u.s. 423 (1962) "> u.s. supreme court general finance corp. v. archetto, 369 u.s. 423 (1962) 369 u.s. 423 general finance corp. v. archetto. appeal from the supreme court of rhode island. no. 705. decided april 16, 1962. appeal dismissed.....
Judgment:
BROWN v. KETCH - 369 U.S. 423 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court BROWN v. KETCH, 369 U.S. 423 (1962) 369 U.S. 423

BROWN v. KETCH.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 751.
Decided April 16, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 423, 424


GENERAL FINANCE CORP. v. ARCHETTO, <a href="/100361"> 369 U.S. 423 </a> (1962) 369 U.S. 423 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court GENERAL FINANCE CORP. v. ARCHETTO, 369 U.S. 423 (1962) 369 U.S. 423

GENERAL FINANCE CORP. v. ARCHETTO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND.
No. 705.
Decided April 16, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ R. I. ___, 176 A. 2d 73.

Aram K. Berberian for appellant.

J. Joseph Nugent, Attorney General of Rhode Island, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //