Skip to content


Warren Vs. Larson - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number369 U.S. 427
AppellantWarren
RespondentLarson
Excerpt:
.....the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. mr. justice frankfurter and mr. justice white took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 369 u.s. 427, 428 .....
Judgment:
WARREN v. LARSON - 369 U.S. 427 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court WARREN v. LARSON, 369 U.S. 427 (1962) 369 U.S. 427

WARREN v. LARSON, STATE TREASURER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 920, Misc.
Decided April 16, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 132 So.2d 177.

Walter Warren for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Robert J. Kelly and Gerald Mager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 369 U.S. 427, 428




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //