Skip to content


Kavanagh Vs. Stenhouse - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number368 U.S. 516
AppellantKavanagh
RespondentStenhouse
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of rhode island. no. 615. decided february 19, 1962. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: ___ r. i. ___, 174 a. 2d 560. aram k. berberian for appellant. j. joseph nugent, attorney general of rhode island, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to a hearing of the case on the merits. rainsberger v. leypoldt, 368 u.s. 516 (1962) 368 u.s. 516 (1962) "> u.s. supreme court rainsberger v. leypoldt, 368 u.s. 516 (1962) 368 u.s. 516 .....
Judgment:
KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE - 368 U.S. 516 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE, 368 U.S. 516 (1962) 368 U.S. 516

KAVANAGH v. STENHOUSE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND.
No. 615.
Decided February 19, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ R. I. ___, 174 A. 2d 560.

Aram K. Berberian for appellant.

J. Joseph Nugent, Attorney General of Rhode Island, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to a hearing of the case on the merits.


RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, <a href="/100405"> 368 U.S. 516 </a> (1962) 368 U.S. 516 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, 368 U.S. 516 (1962) 368 U.S. 516

RAINSBERGER v. LEYPOLDT, SHERIFF.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA.
No. 835, Misc.
Decided February 19, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 77 Nev. 399, 365 P.2d 489.

Samuel S. Lionel for appellant.

John F. Mendoza and Charles L. Garner for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 368 U.S. 516, 517




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //