Skip to content


New York Central Railroad Co. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number368 U.S. 349
AppellantNew York Central Railroad Co.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
.....york central railroad co. v. united states - 368 u.s. 349 (1962) u.s. supreme court new york central railroad co. v. united states, 368 u.s. 349 (1962) 368 u.s. 349 new york central railroad co. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. no. 482. decided january 8, 1962. 194 f. supp. 947, affirmed. robert d. brooks and alfred a. green for appellant. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, lionel kestenbaum, elliott h. moyer and robert w. ginnane for the united states et al., and clyde b. aitchison, john r. turney, frederick a. babson, jr. and john h. eisenhart, jr. for the national freight traffic assn., inc., et al., appellees. per curiam. the.....
Judgment:
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES - 368 U.S. 349 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 368 U.S. 349 (1962) 368 U.S. 349

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 482.
Decided January 8, 1962.

194 F. Supp. 947, affirmed.

Robert D. Brooks and Alfred A. Green for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Clyde B. Aitchison, John R. Turney, Frederick A. Babson, Jr. and John H. Eisenhart, Jr. for the National Freight Traffic Assn., Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC. v. NEW YORK, <a href="/100419"> 368 U.S. 349 </a> (1962) 368 U.S. 349 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC. v. NEW YORK, 368 U.S. 349 (1962) 368 U.S. 349

SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC., v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 517.
Decided January 8, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 10 N. Y. 2d 727, 748, 176 N. E. 2d 839, 177 N. E. 2d 47.

Harold H. Levin and Larry M. Lavinsky for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 368 U.S. 349, 350




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //