Skip to content


Frank Adams and Co. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 215
AppellantFrank Adams and Co.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
frank adams & co. v. united states - 375 u.s. 215 (1963) u.s. supreme court frank adams & co. v. united states, 375 u.s. 215 (1963) 375 u.s. 215 frank adams & co. et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of ohio. no. 506. decided december 9, 1963. affirmed. howard gould for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general orrick, robert b. hummel, irwin a. seibel, robert w. ginnane and h. neil garson for the united states and the interstate commerce commission. f.b. henderson, richard j. murphy, kemper a. dobbins, r.b. claytor and robert h. bierma for appellee rail carriers. per curiam. the motion of henry b. street for leave to withdraw.....
Judgment:
FRANK ADAMS & CO. v. UNITED STATES - 375 U.S. 215 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court FRANK ADAMS & CO. v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 215 (1963) 375 U.S. 215

FRANK ADAMS & CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
OHIO. No. 506.
Decided December 9, 1963.

Affirmed.

Howard Gould for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

F.B. Henderson, Richard J. Murphy, Kemper A. Dobbins, R.B. Claytor and Robert H. Bierma for appellee rail carriers.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Henry B. Street for leave to withdraw his appearance as counsel for the appellants is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 375 U.S. 215, 216




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //