Skip to content


Brotherhood, Maintenance, Way Employes Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 216
AppellantBrotherhood, Maintenance, Way Employes
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
brotherhood, maintenance, way employes v. united states - 375 u.s. 216 (1963) u.s. supreme court brotherhood, maintenance, way employes v. united states, 375 u.s. 216 (1963) 375 u.s. 216 brotherhood of maintenance of way employes et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of michigan. no. 510. decided december 9, 1963. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 511, brotherhood of railway & steamship clerks, freight handlers, express & station employees et al. v. united states et al., also on appeal from the same court. 221 f. supp. 19, affirmed. clarence m. mulholland, richard r. lyman, edward j. hickey, jr., william g. mahoney and harry a. carson for appellants.....
Judgment:
BROTHERHOOD, MAINTENANCE, WAY EMPLOYES v. UNITED STATES - 375 U.S. 216 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court BROTHERHOOD, MAINTENANCE, WAY EMPLOYES v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 216 (1963) 375 U.S. 216

BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 510.
Decided December 9, 1963. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 511, Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same Court.

221 F. Supp. 19, affirmed.

Clarence M. Mulholland, Richard R. Lyman, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., William G. Mahoney and Harry A. Carson for appellants in No. 510. Charles S. Rhyne, Edward D. Means, Jr. and Alfred J. Tighe for appellants in No. 511.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Edward K. Wheeler, Hewitt S. Biaett, Robert G. Seaks and Kenneth H. Ekin for appellee carriers.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 375 U.S. 216, 217




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //