Skip to content


Meeker Vs. Ambassador Oil Corp. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 160
AppellantMeeker
RespondentAmbassador Oil Corp.
Excerpt:
.....ambassador oil corp., 375 u.s. 160 (1963) 375 u.s. 160 meeker et ux. v. ambassador oil corp. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit. no. 46. argued november 19-20, 1963. decided december 2, 1963. 308 f.2d 875 , reversed. o. r. adams, jr. argued the cause for petitioners. with him on the brief was r. f. deacon arledge. c. harold thweatt argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief was vivian diffendaffer. per curiam. the judgment of the court of appeals for the tenth circuit is reversed. beacon theatres, inc., v. westover, 359 u.s. 500 ; dairy queen, inc., v. wood, 369 u.s. 469 . berry v. new york, 375 u.s. 160 (1963) 375 u.s. 160 (1963) "> u.s. supreme.....
Judgment:
MEEKER v. AMBASSADOR OIL CORP. - 375 U.S. 160 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court MEEKER v. AMBASSADOR OIL CORP., 375 U.S. 160 (1963) 375 U.S. 160

MEEKER ET UX. v. AMBASSADOR OIL CORP.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 46.
Argued November 19-20, 1963.
Decided December 2, 1963.

308 F.2d 875 , reversed.

O. R. Adams, Jr. argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was R. F. Deacon Arledge.

C. Harold Thweatt argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Vivian Diffendaffer.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reversed. Beacon Theatres, Inc., v. Westover, 359 U.S. 500 ; Dairy Queen, Inc., v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469 .


BERRY v. NEW YORK, <a href="/100445"> 375 U.S. 160 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 160 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court BERRY v. NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 160 (1963) 375 U.S. 160

BERRY v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT
OF NEW YORK, FOURTH JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 163, Misc.
Decided December 2, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Michael R. Canestrano for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department, for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 375 U.S. 160, 161




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //