Skip to content


South Coast Fisheries Vs. Department of Fish and Game - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 57
AppellantSouth Coast Fisheries
RespondentDepartment of Fish and Game
Excerpt:
.....coast fisheries v. department of fish and game - 375 u.s. 57 (1963) u.s. supreme court south coast fisheries v. department of fish and game, 375 u.s. 57 (1963) 375 u.s. 57 south coast fisheries, inc., et al. v. department of fish and game. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 372. decided october 28, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 213 cal. app. 2d 325, 28 cal. rptr. 537. john j. real for appellants. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, dan kaufmann, assistant attorney general, and neal j. gobar, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want.....
Judgment:
SOUTH COAST FISHERIES v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME - 375 U.S. 57 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court SOUTH COAST FISHERIES v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, 375 U.S. 57 (1963) 375 U.S. 57

SOUTH COAST FISHERIES, INC., ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 372.
Decided October 28, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 213 Cal. App. 2d 325, 28 Cal. Rptr. 537.

John J. Real for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Neal J. Gobar, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS, <a href="/100457"> 375 U.S. 57 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 57 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS, 375 U.S. 57 (1963) 375 U.S. 57

ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO., INC., v. GULF COAST RICE MILLS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 424.
Decided October 28, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 362 S. W. 2d 159.

John D. Richardson for appellant.

Lamar Carnes for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 57, 58




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //