Skip to content


Davis Vs. City of Bowling Green - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 43
AppellantDavis
RespondentCity of Bowling Green
Excerpt:
.....to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 375 u.s. 43, 44 humble oil & refining co. v. male, 375 u.s. 43 (1963) 375 u.s. 43 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court humble oil & refining co. v. male, 375 u.s. 43 (1963) 375 u.s. 43 humble oil & refining co. et al. v. male, commissioner, department of labor & industry, new jersey. appeal from the supreme court of new jersey. no. 326. decided october 21, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. t. girard wharton and john w. fritz for appellants. arthur j. sills, attorney general of new jersey, and theodore i. botter, first assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the.....
Judgment:
DAVIS v. CITY OF BOWLING GREEN - 375 U.S. 43 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court DAVIS v. CITY OF BOWLING GREEN, 375 U.S. 43 (1963) 375 U.S. 43

DAVIS ET AL. v. CITY OF BOWLING GREEN, KENTUCKY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
KENTUCKY. No. 331.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Judgment affirmed.

Albert O. Scafuro for appellants.

Squire R. Ogden for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 375 U.S. 43, 44


HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. v. MALE, <a href="/100466"> 375 U.S. 43 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 43 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. v. MALE, 375 U.S. 43 (1963) 375 U.S. 43

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL. v. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT
OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 326.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

T. Girard Wharton and John W. Fritz for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //