Skip to content


Averitt Vs. Mississippi - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 5
AppellantAveritt
RespondentMississippi
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of mississippi. no. 162. decided october 14, 1963. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 246 miss. 49, 149 so.2d 320. forrest b. jackson for appellants. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 375 u.s. 5, 6 lemmon v. robertson, 375 u.s. 5 (1963) 375 u.s. 5 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court lemmon v. robertson, 375 u.s. 5 (1963) 375 u.s. 5 lemmon et al. v. robertson et al. appeal from the supreme court of kansas. no. 47. decided october 14, 1963. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported.....
Judgment:
AVERITT v. MISSISSIPPI - 375 U.S. 5 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court AVERITT v. MISSISSIPPI, 375 U.S. 5 (1963) 375 U.S. 5

AVERITT ET AL. v. MISSISSIPPI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 162.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 246 Miss. 49, 149 So.2d 320.

Forrest B. Jackson for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 375 U.S. 5, 6


LEMMON v. ROBERTSON, <a href="/100477"> 375 U.S. 5 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 5 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court LEMMON v. ROBERTSON, 375 U.S. 5 (1963) 375 U.S. 5

LEMMON ET AL. v. ROBERTSON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 47.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 189 Kan. 619, 371 P.2d 175.

Jay W. Scovel for appellants.

Appellees pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellees, Lewis Woodard and May Woodard, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //