Skip to content


Friedman Vs. Court on the Judiciary - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 10
AppellantFriedman
RespondentCourt on the Judiciary
Excerpt:
.....court on the judiciary of the state of new york. no. 285. decided october 14, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. theodore kiendl and raphael h. weissman for appellant. john r. davison and william r. brennan for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. louisiana v. jeansonne, 375 u.s. 10 (1963) 375 u.s. 10 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court louisiana v. jeansonne, 375 u.s. 10 (1963) 375 u.s. 10 louisiana ex rel. schwegmann bank & trust co. et al. v. jeansonne, state bank commissioner. appeal from the court of.....
Judgment:
FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY - 375 U.S. 10 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY, 375 U.S. 10 (1963) 375 U.S. 10

FRIEDMAN, JUSTICE, v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT ON THE JUDICIARY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
No. 285.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Theodore Kiendl and Raphael H. Weissman for appellant.

John R. Davison and William R. Brennan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


LOUISIANA v. JEANSONNE, <a href="/100482"> 375 U.S. 10 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 10 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court LOUISIANA v. JEANSONNE, 375 U.S. 10 (1963) 375 U.S. 10

LOUISIANA EX REL. SCHWEGMANN BANK & TRUST CO. ET AL. v. JEANSONNE,
STATE BANK COMMISSIONER.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 311.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 144 So.2d 159.

Charles A. O'Niell, Jr. for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 375 U.S. 10, 11




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //