Skip to content


MATSON Vs. QUEEN'S HOSPiTAL - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 12
AppellantMATSON
RespondentQUEEN'S HOSPiTAL
Excerpt:
.....certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 375 u.s. 12, 13 roadway express, inc., v. united states, 375 u.s. 12 (1963) 375 u.s. 12 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court roadway express, inc., v. united states, 375 u.s. 12 (1963) 375 u.s. 12 roadway express, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of delaware. no. 177. decided october 14, 1963. 213 f. supp. 868, affirmed. howell ellis, homer s. carpenter and john c. bradley for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general orrick, lionel kestenbaum, colin a. smith and robert w. ginnane for the united states et al. nuel d. belnap, harry c. ames, jr. and leonard a. jaskiewicz for motor carrier.....
Judgment:
MATSON v. QUEEN'S HOSPITAL - 375 U.S. 12 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court MATSON v. QUEEN'S HOSPITAL, 375 U.S. 12 (1963) 375 U.S. 12

MATSON v. QUEEN'S HOSPITAL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF HAWAII.
No. 353, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 375 U.S. 12, 13


ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100484"> 375 U.S. 12 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 12 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 12 (1963) 375 U.S. 12

ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
No. 177.
Decided October 14, 1963.

213 F. Supp. 868, affirmed.

Howell Ellis, Homer S. Carpenter and John C. Bradley for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Colin A. Smith and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.

Nuel D. Belnap, Harry C. Ames, Jr. and Leonard A. Jaskiewicz for motor carrier appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //