Skip to content


In Re Jenison - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 14
AppellantIn Re Jenison
Excerpt:
.....below: 265 minn. 96, 120 n. w. 2d 515. john s. connolly for petitioner. walter f. mondale, attorney general of minnesota, and charles e. houston, solicitor general, for the state of minnesota. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of minnesota for further consideration in light of sherbert v. verner, 374 u.s. 398 . johnson v. wilkins, 375 u.s. 14 (1963) 375 u.s. 14 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court johnson v. wilkins, 375 u.s. 14 (1963) 375 u.s. 14 johnson v. wilkins, warden. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 141, misc. decided october 14, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal.....
Judgment:
IN RE JENISON - 375 U.S. 14 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court IN RE JENISON, 375 U.S. 14 (1963) 375 U.S. 14

IN RE JENISON.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 238.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 265 Minn. 96, 120 N. W. 2d 515.

John S. Connolly for petitioner.

Walter F. Mondale, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Charles E. Houston, Solicitor General, for the State of Minnesota.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Minnesota for further consideration in light of Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 .


JOHNSON v. WILKINS, <a href="/100486"> 375 U.S. 14 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 14 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court JOHNSON v. WILKINS, 375 U.S. 14 (1963) 375 U.S. 14

JOHNSON v. WILKINS, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 141, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 12 N. Y. 2d 843, 187 N. E. 2d 473.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Winifred C. Stanley, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 14, 15




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //