Skip to content


Cepero Vs. Peloso - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 16
AppellantCepero
RespondentPeloso
Excerpt:
cepero v. peloso - 375 u.s. 16 (1963) u.s. supreme court cepero v. peloso, 375 u.s. 16 (1963) 375 u.s. 16 cepero v. peloso. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. no. 116, misc. decided october 14, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. appellant pro se. solicitor general cox for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. page 375 u.s. 16, 17 reatz v. new york, 375 u.s. 16 (1963) 375 u.s. 16 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court reatz v. new york, 375 u.s. 16 (1963) 375 u.s. 16 reatz v. new york. on petition for writ of certiorari to the appellate division,.....
Judgment:
CEPERO v. PELOSO - 375 U.S. 16 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court CEPERO v. PELOSO, 375 U.S. 16 (1963) 375 U.S. 16

CEPERO v. PELOSO.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 116, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Cox for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Page 375 U.S. 16, 17


REATZ v. NEW YORK, <a href="/100488"> 375 U.S. 16 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 16 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court REATZ v. NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 16 (1963) 375 U.S. 16

REATZ v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT
OF NEW YORK, SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 50, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

William I. Siegel for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for further consideration in light of Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , Eskridge v. Washington Prison Board, 357 U.S. 214 , and Norvell v. Illinois, 373 U.S. 420 .




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //