Skip to content


Newsome Vs. North Carolina - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 21
AppellantNewsome
RespondentNorth Carolina
Excerpt:
newsome v. north carolina - 375 u.s. 21 (1963) u.s. supreme court newsome v. north carolina, 375 u.s. 21 (1963) 375 u.s. 21 newsome v. north carolina. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of north carolina. no. 11, misc. decided october 14, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. thomas wade bruton, attorney general of north carolina, and ralph moody, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of north carolina for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s......
Judgment:
NEWSOME v. NORTH CAROLINA - 375 U.S. 21 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court NEWSOME v. NORTH CAROLINA, 375 U.S. 21 (1963) 375 U.S. 21

NEWSOME v. NORTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 11, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, ante, p. 3, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

Page 375 U.S. 21, 22




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //