Skip to content


Cooper Vs. Alabama - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number375 U.S. 23
AppellantCooper
RespondentAlabama
Excerpt:
cooper v. alabama - 375 u.s. 23 (1963) u.s. supreme court cooper v. alabama, 375 u.s. 23 (1963) 375 u.s. 23 cooper v. alabama. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of alabama. no. 32, misc. decided october 14, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 274 ala. 471, 149 so.2d 834. petitioner pro se. richmond m. flowers, attorney general of alabama, and david w. clark, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of alabama for further consideration in light of lane v. brown, 372 u.s......
Judgment:
COOPER v. ALABAMA - 375 U.S. 23 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court COOPER v. ALABAMA, 375 U.S. 23 (1963) 375 U.S. 23

COOPER v. ALABAMA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 32, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 274 Ala. 471, 149 So.2d 834.

Petitioner pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Alabama for further consideration in light of Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 .

Page 375 U.S. 23, 24




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //