Skip to content


Robinson Vs. Hunter - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number374 U.S. 488
AppellantRobinson
RespondentHunter
Excerpt:
..... l. w. holt, henry halvor jones and simon lawrence cain for appellants. robert y. button, attorney general of virginia, and r. d. mcilwaine iii, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. walker v. walker, 374 u.s. 488 (1963) 374 u.s. 488 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court walker v. walker, 374 u.s. 488 (1963) 374 u.s. 488 walker v. walker, warden, et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. no. 180, misc. decided june 17, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 302 f.2d 265 . petitioner pro se. jack p. f. gremillion,.....
Judgment:
ROBINSON v. HUNTER - 374 U.S. 488 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court ROBINSON v. HUNTER, 374 U.S. 488 (1963) 374 U.S. 488

ROBINSON ET AL. v. HUNTER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA. No. 5, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

194 F. Supp. 423, affirmed.

L. W. Holt, Henry Halvor Jones and Simon Lawrence Cain for appellants.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


WALKER v. WALKER, <a href="/100512"> 374 U.S. 488 </a> (1963) 374 U.S. 488 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court WALKER v. WALKER, 374 U.S. 488 (1963) 374 U.S. 488

WALKER v. WALKER, WARDEN, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 180, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 302 F.2d 265 .

Petitioner pro se.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and Scallan E. Walsh, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 374 U.S. 488, 489




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //