Skip to content


Paige Vs. North Carolina - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number374 U.S. 491
AppellantPaige
RespondentNorth Carolina
Excerpt:
paige v. north carolina - 374 u.s. 491 (1963) u.s. supreme court paige v. north carolina, 374 u.s. 491 (1963) 374 u.s. 491 paige v. north carolina. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of north carolina. no. 884, misc. decided june 17, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. thomas wade bruton, attorney general of north carolina, and ralph moody, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 . acuff v. texas, 374 u.s......
Judgment:
PAIGE v. NORTH CAROLINA - 374 U.S. 491 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court PAIGE v. NORTH CAROLINA, 374 U.S. 491 (1963) 374 U.S. 491

PAIGE v. NORTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 884, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .


ACUFF v. TEXAS, <a href="/100515"> 374 U.S. 491 </a> (1963) 374 U.S. 491 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court ACUFF v. TEXAS, 374 U.S. 491 (1963) 374 U.S. 491

ACUFF v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 1348, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 172 Tex. Cr. R. 176, 354 S. W. 2d 939.

Appellant pro se.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Sam R. Wilson, Linward Shivers, Allo B. Crow, Jr. and Gilbert J. Pena, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 374 U.S. 491, 492




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //