Skip to content


Regalado Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number374 U.S. 497
AppellantRegalado
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....497 (1963) u.s. supreme court regalado v. california, 374 u.s. 497 (1963) 374 u.s. 497 regalado v. california et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of california. no. 10, misc. decided june 17, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: see 193 cal. app. 2d 437, 14 cal. rptr. 217. petitioner pro se. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, william e. james, assistant attorney general, and s. clark moore, deputy attorney general, for respondents. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the supreme court of california is vacated and the case is remanded for further.....
Judgment:
REGALADO v. CALIFORNIA - 374 U.S. 497 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court REGALADO v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 497 (1963) 374 U.S. 497

REGALADO v. CALIFORNIA ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 10, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: See 193 Cal. App. 2d 437, 14 Cal. Rptr. 217.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Clark Moore, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Ker v. California, ante, p. 23, and McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result.

Page 374 U.S. 497, 498




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //