Skip to content


Scott Vs. Pennsylvania - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number374 U.S. 95
AppellantScott
RespondentPennsylvania
Excerpt:
.....federal question. page 374 u.s. 95, 96 sloan's moving & storage co., inc., v. united states, 374 u.s. 95 (1963) 374 u.s. 95 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court sloan's moving & storage co., inc., v. united states, 374 u.s. 95 (1963) 374 u.s. 95 sloan's moving & storage co., inc., v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of missouri. no. 880. decided june 10, 1963. 208 f. supp. 567, affirmed. herbert burstein for appellant. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, robert b. hummel, robert w. ginnane and h. neil garson for the united states and the interstate commerce commission; and bernard g. segal, richmond c. coburn, s. harrison kahn,.....
Judgment:
SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA - 374 U.S. 95 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA, 374 U.S. 95 (1963) 374 U.S. 95

SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 1003, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Appellant pro se.

Walter E. Alessandroni, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and George G. Lindsay, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 374 U.S. 95, 96


SLOAN'S MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100542"> 374 U.S. 95 </a> (1963) 374 U.S. 95 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court SLOAN'S MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES, 374 U.S. 95 (1963) 374 U.S. 95

SLOAN'S MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
MISSOURI. No. 880.
Decided June 10, 1963.

208 F. Supp. 567, affirmed.

Herbert Burstein for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and Bernard G. Segal, Richmond C. Coburn, S. Harrison Kahn, Irving R. Segal and Robert L. Kendall, Jr. for United Parcel Service, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //