Skip to content


Briggs Vs. Louisiana State Bar Association - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number374 U.S. 96
AppellantBriggs
RespondentLouisiana State Bar Association
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of louisiana. no. 1070, misc. decided june 10, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. appellant pro se. felicien y. lozes for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. bollettieri v. new york, 374 u.s. 96 (1963) 374 u.s. 96 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court bollettieri v. new york, 374 u.s. 96 (1963) 374 u.s. 96 bollettieri v. new york. appeal from the supreme court of new york, oneida county. no. 1378, misc. decided june 10, 1963. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. appellant pro se. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, and.....
Judgment:
BRIGGS v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION - 374 U.S. 96 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court BRIGGS v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, 374 U.S. 96 (1963) 374 U.S. 96

BRIGGS v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 1070, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Appellant pro se.

Felicien Y. Lozes for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BOLLETTIERI v. NEW YORK, <a href="/100543"> 374 U.S. 96 </a> (1963) 374 U.S. 96 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court BOLLETTIERI v. NEW YORK, 374 U.S. 96 (1963) 374 U.S. 96

BOLLETTIERI v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, ONEIDA COUNTY.
No. 1378, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Robert E. Fischer and Maxwell B. Spoont, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 374 U.S. 96, 97




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //