Skip to content


Henry Vs. Virginia - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number374 U.S. 98
AppellantHenry
RespondentVirginia
Excerpt:
henry v. virginia - 374 u.s. 98 (1963) u.s. supreme court henry v. virginia, 374 u.s. 98 (1963) 374 u.s. 98 henry et al. v. virginia. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of virginia. no. 29. decided june 10, 1963. certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and case remanded. herbert o. reid, thurgood marshall, jack greenberg and james m. nabrit iii for petitioners. william j. hassan and peter j. kostik for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of appeals of virginia for reconsideration in light of peterson v. city of greenville, 373 u.s. 244 . mr. justice harlan concurs in the result on.....
Judgment:
HENRY v. VIRGINIA - 374 U.S. 98 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court HENRY v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 98 (1963) 374 U.S. 98

HENRY ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 29.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and case remanded.

Herbert O. Reid, Thurgood Marshall, Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit III for petitioners.

William J. Hassan and Peter J. Kostik for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S., at 248.

Page 374 U.S. 98, 99




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //