Skip to content


Thompson Vs. Virginia - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number374 U.S. 99
AppellantThompson
RespondentVirginia
Excerpt:
.....r. d. mcilwaine iii, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of appeals of virginia for reconsideration in light of peterson v. city of greenville, 373 u.s. 244 . mr. justice harlan concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in peterson v. city of greenville and avent v. north carolina, 373 u.s., at 248. page 374 u.s. 99, 100
Judgment:
THOMPSON v. VIRGINIA - 374 U.S. 99 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court THOMPSON v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 99 (1963) 374 U.S. 99

THOMPSON v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 60.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, S. W. Tucker and Derrick A. Bell, Jr. for petitioner.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S., at 248.

Page 374 U.S. 99, 100




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //