Skip to content


Wood Vs. Virginia - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number374 U.S. 100
AppellantWood
RespondentVirginia
Excerpt:
wood v. virginia - 374 u.s. 100 (1963) u.s. supreme court wood v. virginia, 374 u.s. 100 (1963) 374 u.s. 100 wood et al. v. virginia. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of virginia. no. 79. decided june 10, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. melvin l. wulf, leonard w. holt, henry halvor jones and simon lawrence cain for petitioners. robert y. button, attorney general of virginia, and r. d. mcilwaine iii, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of appeals of virginia for reconsideration in light of peterson v. city of greenville, 373.....
Judgment:
WOOD v. VIRGINIA - 374 U.S. 100 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court WOOD v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 100 (1963) 374 U.S. 100

WOOD ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 79.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Melvin L. Wulf, Leonard W. Holt, Henry Halvor Jones and Simon Lawrence Cain for petitioners.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S., at 248.

Page 374 U.S. 100, 101




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //