Skip to content


Huggins Vs. Raines - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number374 U.S. 105
AppellantHuggins
RespondentRaines
Excerpt:
huggins v. raines - 374 u.s. 105 (1963) u.s. supreme court huggins v. raines, 374 u.s. 105 (1963) 374 u.s. 105 huggins v. raines, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of oklahoma. no. 251, misc. decided june 10, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 372 p.2d 248. petitioner pro se. mac q. williamson, attorney general of oklahoma, and lewis a. wallace and hugh h. collum, assistant attorneys general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of criminal appeals of oklahoma for reconsideration in.....
Judgment:
HUGGINS v. RAINES - 374 U.S. 105 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court HUGGINS v. RAINES, 374 U.S. 105 (1963) 374 U.S. 105

HUGGINS v. RAINES, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF
OKLAHOMA. No. 251, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 372 P.2d 248.

Petitioner pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Lewis A. Wallace and Hugh H. Collum, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma for reconsideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , and Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 .

Page 374 U.S. 105, 106




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //