Skip to content


Arizona Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number383 U.S. 268
AppellantArizona
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....and nevada shall furnish to this court and to the secretary of the interior a list of the present perfected rights, with their claimed priority dates, in waters of the mainstream within each state, respectively, in terms of consumptive use, except those relating to federal establishments. any named party to this proceeding may present its claim of present perfected rights or its opposition to the claims of others. the secretary of the interior shall supply similar page 383 u. s. 269 information, within a similar period of time, with respect to the claims of the united states to present perfected rights within each state. if the parties and the secretary of the interior are unable at that time to agree on the present perfected rights to the use of mainstream water in.....
Judgment:
Arizona v. California - 383 U.S. 268 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court Arizona v. California, 383 U.S. 268 (1966)

Arizona v. California

No. 8, Original

Decided June 3, 1963

Decree entered March 9, 1964

Amended Decree entered February 28, 1966

383 U.S. 268

Opinion reported: 373 U. S. 373 U.S. 546; decree reported: 376 U. S. 376 U.S. 340.

ORDERED.

The joint motion to amend Article VI of the Decree in this case entered on March 9, 1964, 376 U. S. 376 U.S. 340, is hereby granted and Article VI of said decree is hereby amended to read as follows:

VI. Within three years from the date of this decree [March 9, 1964], the States of Arizona, California, and Nevada shall furnish to this Court and to the Secretary of the Interior a list of the present perfected rights, with their claimed priority dates, in waters of the mainstream within each State, respectively, in terms of consumptive use, except those relating to federal establishments. Any named party to this proceeding may present its claim of present perfected rights or its opposition to the claims of others. The Secretary of the Interior shall supply similar

Page 383 U. S. 269

information, within a similar period of time, with respect to the claims of the United States to present perfected rights within each State. If the parties and the Secretary of the Interior are unable at that time to agree on the present perfected rights to the use of mainstream water in each State, and their priority dates, any party may apply to the Court for the determination of such rights by the Court.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //