Skip to content


Cepero Vs. United States Congress - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number373 U.S. 545
AppellantCepero
RespondentUnited States Congress
Excerpt:
..... (1963) 373 u.s. 545 alabama et al. v. united states et al. on motion for leave to file bill of complaint. no. 15, original. decided may 27, 1963. motion for leave to file proposed bill of complaint, as amended, denied. j. kirkman jackson, john p. kohn, george stephen leonard, richard l. hirshberg, john w. vardaman, john a. caddell and thos. b. hill, jr. for plaintiffs. solicitor general cox, ralph s. spritzer and louis f. claiborne for the united states et al. per curiam. the motion for leave to file the proposed bill of complaint, as amended, is denied. in essence the papers show no more than that the president has made ready to exercise the authority conferred upon him by 10 u.s.c. 333 by alerting and stationing military personnel in.....
Judgment:
CEPERO v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS - 373 U.S. 545 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court CEPERO v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS, 373 U.S. 545 (1963) 373 U.S. 545

CEPERO v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1024, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 373 U.S. 545, 546


ALABAMA v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100586"> 373 U.S. 545 </a> (1963) 373 U.S. 545 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court ALABAMA v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 545 (1963) 373 U.S. 545

ALABAMA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT.
No. 15, Original.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Motion for leave to file proposed bill of complaint, as amended, denied.

J. Kirkman Jackson, John P. Kohn, George Stephen Leonard, Richard L. Hirshberg, John W. Vardaman, John A. Caddell and Thos. B. Hill, Jr. for plaintiffs.

Solicitor General Cox, Ralph S. Spritzer and Louis F. Claiborne for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to file the proposed bill of complaint, as amended, is denied. In essence the papers show no more than that the President has made ready to exercise the authority conferred upon him by 10 U.S.C. 333 by alerting and stationing military personnel in the Birmingham area. Such purely preparatory measures and their alleged adverse general effects upon the plaintiffs afford no basis for the granting of any relief.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //