Skip to content


Richards Vs. Pennsylvania - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number373 U.S. 376
AppellantRichards
RespondentPennsylvania
Excerpt:
.....certiorari is denied. page 373 u.s. 376, 377 ship-by-truck co., inc. v. united states, 373 u.s. 376 (1963) 373 u.s. 376 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court ship-by-truck co., inc. v. united states, 373 u.s. 376 (1963) 373 u.s. 376 ship-by-truck co., inc., doing business as graham ship-by-truck co., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of kansas. no. 879. decided may 20, 1963. 208 f. supp 847, affirmed. tom b. kretsinger for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, robert b. hummel, irwin a. seibel, robert w. ginnane and arthur j. cerra for the united states and the interstate commerce commission; and j. f. miller for.....
Judgment:
RICHARDS v. PENNSYLVANIA - 373 U.S. 376 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court RICHARDS v. PENNSYLVANIA, 373 U.S. 376 (1963) 373 U.S. 376

RICHARDS v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 887, Misc.
Decided May 20, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 373 U.S. 376, 377


SHIP-BY-TRUCK CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100597"> 373 U.S. 376 </a> (1963) 373 U.S. 376 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court SHIP-BY-TRUCK CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 376 (1963) 373 U.S. 376

SHIP-BY-TRUCK CO., INC., DOING BUSINESS AS GRAHAM SHIP-BY-TRUCK CO., ET AL.
v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 879.
Decided May 20, 1963.

208 F. Supp 847, affirmed.

Tom B. Kretsinger for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and J. F. Miller for Stevens Express, Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //