Skip to content


Drexel Vs. Ohio Pardon and Parole Commission - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number373 U.S. 377
AppellantDrexel
RespondentOhio Pardon and Parole Commission
Excerpt:
drexel v. ohio pardon and parole commission - 373 u.s. 377 (1963) u.s. supreme court drexel v. ohio pardon and parole commission, 373 u.s. 377 (1963) 373 u.s. 377 drexel v. ohio pardon and parole commission. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of ohio. no. 975, misc. decided may 20, 1963. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. page 373 u.s. 377, 378 atwood's transport lines, inc. v. united states, 373 u.s. 377 (1963) 373 u.s. 377 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court atwood's transport lines, inc. v. united states, 373 u.s. 377 (1963) 373 u.s. 377 atwood's transport lines, inc., v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the.....
Judgment:
DREXEL v. OHIO PARDON AND PAROLE COMMISSION - 373 U.S. 377 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court DREXEL v. OHIO PARDON AND PAROLE COMMISSION, 373 U.S. 377 (1963) 373 U.S. 377

DREXEL v. OHIO PARDON AND PAROLE COMMISSION.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
OHIO. No. 975, Misc.
Decided May 20, 1963.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 373 U.S. 377, 378


ATWOOD'S TRANSPORT LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100598"> 373 U.S. 377 </a> (1963) 373 U.S. 377 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court ATWOOD'S TRANSPORT LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 377 (1963) 373 U.S. 377

ATWOOD'S TRANSPORT LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 935.
Decided May 20, 1963.

211 F. Supp. 168, affirmed.

James E. Wilson and Edward G. Villalon for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and S. Harrison Kahn for Alexandria, Barcroft & Washington Transit Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //