Skip to content


illinois Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number373 U.S. 378
Appellantillinois
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
illinois v. united states - 373 u.s. 378 (1963) u.s. supreme court illinois v. united states, 373 u.s. 378 (1963) 373 u.s. 378 illinois et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 937. decided may 20, 1963. 213 f. supp. 83, affirmed. william g. clark, attorney general of illinois, edward v. hanrahan, special assistant attorney general, harold a. cowen, assistant attorney general, and s. ashley guthrie for appellants. robert w. ginnane and stanton p. sender for the united states and the interstate commerce commission; and james j. magner, frederick e. stout and l. agnew myers, jr. for chicago north shore & milwaukee railway, appellees. per curiam. the.....
Judgment:
ILLINOIS v. UNITED STATES - 373 U.S. 378 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court ILLINOIS v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 378 (1963) 373 U.S. 378

ILLINOIS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 937.
Decided May 20, 1963.

213 F. Supp. 83, affirmed.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Edward V. Hanrahan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Harold A. Cowen, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Ashley Guthrie for appellants.

Robert W. Ginnane and Stanton P. Sender for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and James J. Magner, Frederick E. Stout and L. Agnew Myers, Jr. for Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Railway, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 373 U.S. 378, 379




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //