Skip to content


Flora Construction Co. Vs. Grand Junction Steel Fab. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number373 U.S. 240
AppellantFlora Construction Co.
RespondentGrand Junction Steel Fab.
Excerpt:
.....states district court for the district of nevada. no. 949. decided may 13, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. per curiam. the motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 373 u.s. 240, 241 shott v. ohio, 373 u.s. 240 (1963) 373 u.s. 240 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court shott v. ohio, 373 u.s. 240 (1963) 373 u.s. 240 shott v. ohio. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 877. decided may 13, 1963. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 173 ohio st. 542, 184 n. e. 2d 213. thurman arnold, james g. andrews, jr. and john a. lloyd,.....
Judgment:
FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB. - 373 U.S. 240 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB., 373 U.S. 240 (1963) 373 U.S. 240

FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FABRICATING CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA.
No. 949.
Decided May 13, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 373 U.S. 240, 241


SHOTT v. OHIO, <a href="/100610"> 373 U.S. 240 </a> (1963) 373 U.S. 240 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court SHOTT v. OHIO, 373 U.S. 240 (1963) 373 U.S. 240

SHOTT v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 877.
Decided May 13, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 542, 184 N. E. 2d 213.

Thurman Arnold, James G. Andrews, Jr. and John A. Lloyd, Jr. for appellant.

Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //