Skip to content


Patterson Vs. City of Newport News - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 771
AppellantPatterson
RespondentCity of Newport News
Excerpt:
..... the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 372 u.s. 771, 772 tiller v. california, 372 u.s. 771 (1963) 372 u.s. 771 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court tiller v. california, 372 u.s. 771 (1963) 372 u.s. 771 tiller v. california et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the district court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 797, misc. decided april 22, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 206 cal. app. 2d 534, 23 cal. rptr. 876. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted......
Judgment:
PATTERSON v. CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS - 372 U.S. 771 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court PATTERSON v. CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, 372 U.S. 771 (1963) 372 U.S. 771

PATTERSON v. CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 983, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 372 U.S. 771, 772


TILLER v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/100631"> 372 U.S. 771 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 771 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court TILLER v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 771 (1963) 372 U.S. 771

TILLER v. CALIFORNIA ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 797, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 206 Cal. App. 2d 534, 23 Cal. Rptr. 876.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //