Skip to content


Walker Vs. Randolph - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 773
AppellantWalker
RespondentRandolph
Excerpt:
walker v. randolph - 372 u.s. 773 (1963) u.s. supreme court walker v. randolph, 372 u.s. 773 (1963) 372 u.s. 773 walker v. randolph, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court of williamson county, illinois. no. 2, misc. decided april 22, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. william g. clark, attorney general of illinois, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 . page 372 u.s. 773, 774
Judgment:
WALKER v. RANDOLPH - 372 U.S. 773 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court WALKER v. RANDOLPH, 372 U.S. 773 (1963) 372 U.S. 773

WALKER v. RANDOLPH, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WILLIAMSON
COUNTY, ILLINOIS. No. 2, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 372 U.S. 773, 774




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //