Skip to content


Laforge Vs. Wainwright - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 774
AppellantLaforge
RespondentWainwright
Excerpt:
laforge v. wainwright - 372 u.s. 774 (1963) u.s. supreme court laforge v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 774 (1963) 372 u.s. 774 laforge v. wainwright, corrections director. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of florida. no. 6, misc. decided april 22, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. richard w. ervin, attorney general of florida, and bruce r. jacob, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 . page 372 u.s. 774, 775
Judgment:
LaFORGE v. WAINWRIGHT - 372 U.S. 774 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court LaFORGE v. WAINWRIGHT, 372 U.S. 774 (1963) 372 U.S. 774

LaFORGE v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 6, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Bruce R. Jacob, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 372 U.S. 774, 775




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //