Skip to content


Tyler Vs. North Carolina - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 775
AppellantTyler
RespondentNorth Carolina
Excerpt:
tyler v. north carolina - 372 u.s. 775 (1963) u.s. supreme court tyler v. north carolina, 372 u.s. 775 (1963) 372 u.s. 775 tyler v. north carolina. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of north carolina. no. 8, misc. decided april 22, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. thomas wade bruton, attorney general of north carolina, and ralph moody, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 . page 372 u.s. 775, 776
Judgment:
TYLER v. NORTH CAROLINA - 372 U.S. 775 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court TYLER v. NORTH CAROLINA, 372 U.S. 775 (1963) 372 U.S. 775

TYLER v. NORTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 8, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 372 U.S. 775, 776




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //