Skip to content


Patterson Vs. Warden - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 776
AppellantPatterson
RespondentWarden
Excerpt:
.....assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 . page 372 u.s. 776, 777 .....
Judgment:
PATTERSON v. WARDEN - 372 U.S. 776 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court PATTERSON v. WARDEN, 372 U.S. 776 (1963) 372 U.S. 776

PATTERSON v. WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 14, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 227 Md. 194, 175 A. 2d 746.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Gerard W. Wittstadt, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 372 U.S. 776, 777




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //