Skip to content


Lindner Vs. Nash - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 777
AppellantLindner
RespondentNash
Excerpt:
lindner v. nash - 372 u.s. 777 (1963) u.s. supreme court lindner v. nash, 372 u.s. 777 (1963) 372 u.s. 777 lindner v. nash, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of missouri. no. 61, misc. decided april 22, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. thomas f. eagleton, attorney general of missouri, and howard l. mcfadden, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 . page 372 u.s. 777, 778
Judgment:
LINDNER v. NASH - 372 U.S. 777 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court LINDNER v. NASH, 372 U.S. 777 (1963) 372 U.S. 777

LINDNER v. NASH, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 61, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas F. Eagleton, Attorney General of Missouri, and Howard L. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 372 U.S. 777, 778




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //