Skip to content


Tull Vs. Wainwright - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 778
AppellantTull
RespondentWainwright
Excerpt:
tull v. wainwright - 372 u.s. 778 (1963) u.s. supreme court tull v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 778 (1963) 372 u.s. 778 tull v. wainwright, corrections director. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of florida. no. 126, misc. decided april 22, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. richard w. ervin, attorney general of florida, and james g. mahorner, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 . page 372 u.s. 778, 779
Judgment:
TULL v. WAINWRIGHT - 372 U.S. 778 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court TULL v. WAINWRIGHT, 372 U.S. 778 (1963) 372 U.S. 778

TULL v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 126, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 372 U.S. 778, 779




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //