Skip to content


Jordan Vs. Wiman - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 780
AppellantJordan
RespondentWiman
Excerpt:
.....u.s. 780 (1963) 372 u.s. 780 jordan v. wiman, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of alabama. no. 250, misc. decided april 22, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 273 ala. 709, 142 so.2d 679. petitioner pro se. macdonald gallion, attorney general of alabama, and david w. clark, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 . page 372 u.s. 780, 781
Judgment:
JORDAN v. WIMAN - 372 U.S. 780 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court JORDAN v. WIMAN, 372 U.S. 780 (1963) 372 U.S. 780

JORDAN v. WIMAN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 250, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 273 Ala. 709, 142 So.2d 679.

Petitioner pro se.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

Page 372 U.S. 780, 781




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //