Skip to content


Karpel Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 703
AppellantKarpel
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....superior court of california, los angeles county. no. 809. decided april 15, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. morris lavine for appellant. roger arnebergh, philip e. grey and wm. e. doran for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 372 u.s. 703, 704 johnson v. california, 372 u.s. 703 (1963) 372 u.s. 703 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court johnson v. california, 372 u.s. 703 (1963) 372 u.s. 703 johnson et ux. v. california. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 781. decided april 15, 1963. appeal dismissed and.....
Judgment:
KARPEL v. CALIFORNIA - 372 U.S. 703 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court KARPEL v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 703 (1963) 372 U.S. 703

KARPEL v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
LOS ANGELES COUNTY. No. 809.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Morris Lavine for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 372 U.S. 703, 704


JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/100651"> 372 U.S. 703 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 703 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 703 (1963) 372 U.S. 703

JOHNSON ET UX. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 781.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 203 Cal. App. 2d 712, 22 Cal. Rptr. 149.

Leslie W. Irving and Scott D. Kellogg for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Howard S. Goldin, Assistant Attorney General, and N. B. Peek and Warren J. Abbott, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //