Skip to content


Salt River Project Agri. Improv. and Power Dist. Vs. Mesa - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 704
AppellantSalt River Project Agri. Improv. and Power Dist.
RespondentMesa
Excerpt:
.....and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. daniels v. united states, 372 u.s. 704 (1963) 372 u.s. 704 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court daniels v. united states, 372 u.s. 704 (1963) 372 u.s. 704 daniels v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of montana. no. 814. decided april 15, 1963. 210 f. supp. 942, affirmed. john w. bonner for appellant. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general loevinger, robert b. hummel, robert w. ginnane and arthur j. cerra for the united states and the interstate commerce commission; newell gough, jr. and edwin s. booth for great northern railway co., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm.....
Judgment:
SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRI. IMPROV. & POWER DIST. v. MESA - 372 U.S. 704 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRI. IMPROV. & POWER DIST. v. MESA, 372 U.S. 704 (1963) 372 U.S. 704

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT & POWER DIST. v. CITY OF MESA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 803.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 92 Ariz. 91, 373 P.2d 722.

William R. Meagher for appellant.

J. La Mar Shelley, Charles S. Rhyne, Brice W. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


DANIELS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100652"> 372 U.S. 704 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 704 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court DANIELS v. UNITED STATES, 372 U.S. 704 (1963) 372 U.S. 704

DANIELS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA.
No. 814.
Decided April 15, 1963.

210 F. Supp. 942, affirmed.

John W. Bonner for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; Newell Gough, Jr. and Edwin S. Booth for Great Northern Railway Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 372 U.S. 704, 705




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //