Skip to content


Craig Vs. Indiana - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 706
AppellantCraig
RespondentIndiana
Excerpt:
.....v. indiana, 372 u.s. 706 (1963) 372 u.s. 706 craig v. indiana. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of indiana. no. 17, misc. decided april 15, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. edwin k. steers, attorney general of indiana, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of lane v. brown, 372 u.s. 477 . barber v. virginia, 372 u.s. 706 (1963) 372 u.s. 706 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court barber v. virginia, 372 u.s. 706 (1963) 372 u.s. 706 barber v......
Judgment:
CRAIG v. INDIANA - 372 U.S. 706 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court CRAIG v. INDIANA, 372 U.S. 706 (1963) 372 U.S. 706

CRAIG v. INDIANA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 17, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Edwin K. Steers, Attorney General of Indiana, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 .


BARBER v. VIRGINIA, <a href="/100654"> 372 U.S. 706 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 706 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court BARBER v. VIRGINIA, 372 U.S. 706 (1963) 372 U.S. 706

BARBER v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
OF VIRGINIA. No. 134, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , and Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

Page 372 U.S. 706, 707




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //