Skip to content


Thompson Vs. Indiana - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 707
AppellantThompson
RespondentIndiana
Excerpt:
.....v. indiana, 372 u.s. 707 (1963) 372 u.s. 707 thompson v. indiana. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of indiana. no. 4, misc. decided april 15, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. edwin k. steers, attorney general of indiana, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of lane v. brown, 372 u.s. 477 . holloman v. virginia, 372 u.s. 707 (1963) 372 u.s. 707 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court holloman v. virginia, 372 u.s. 707 (1963) 372 u.s. 707 holloman v......
Judgment:
THOMPSON v. INDIANA - 372 U.S. 707 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court THOMPSON v. INDIANA, 372 U.S. 707 (1963) 372 U.S. 707

THOMPSON v. INDIANA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 4, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Edwin K. Steers, Attorney General of Indiana, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 .


HOLLOMAN v. VIRGINIA, <a href="/100655"> 372 U.S. 707 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 707 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court HOLLOMAN v. VIRGINIA, 372 U.S. 707 (1963) 372 U.S. 707

HOLLOMAN v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
OF VIRGINIA. No. 444, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

Page 372 U.S. 707, 708




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //