Skip to content


Fuqua Vs. Mississippi - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 709
AppellantFuqua
RespondentMississippi
Excerpt:
..... the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 372 u.s. 709, 710 collins v. california, 372 u.s. 709 (1963) 372 u.s. 709 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court collins v. california, 372 u.s. 709 (1963) 372 u.s. 709 collins v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the district court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 599, misc. decided april 15, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 203 cal. app. 2d 611, 21 cal. rptr. 783. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the.....
Judgment:
FUQUA v. MISSISSIPPI - 372 U.S. 709 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court FUQUA v. MISSISSIPPI, 372 U.S. 709 (1963) 372 U.S. 709

FUQUA v. MISSISSIPPI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 854.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: ___ Miss. ___, 145 So.2d 152.

E. H. Cunningham, Jr. for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 372 U.S. 709, 710


COLLINS v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/100657"> 372 U.S. 709 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 709 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court COLLINS v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 709 (1963) 372 U.S. 709

COLLINS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 599, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 203 Cal. App. 2d 611, 21 Cal. Rptr. 783.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //