Skip to content


Symons Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 711
AppellantSymons
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
..... u.s. supreme court symons v. california, 372 u.s. 711 (1963) 372 u.s. 711 symons v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the district court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 301, misc. decided april 15, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 201 cal. app. 2d 825, 20 cal. rptr. 400. petitioner pro se. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, william e. james, assistant attorney general, and calvin w. torrance, deputy attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of.....
Judgment:
SYMONS v. CALIFORNIA - 372 U.S. 711 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court SYMONS v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 711 (1963) 372 U.S. 711

SYMONS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 301, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 201 Cal. App. 2d 825, 20 Cal. Rptr. 400.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Calvin W. Torrance, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.

Page 372 U.S. 711, 712




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //