Skip to content


Fields Vs. South Carolina - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 522
AppellantFields
RespondentSouth Carolina
Excerpt:
fields v. south carolina - 372 u.s. 522 (1963) u.s. supreme court fields v. south carolina, 372 u.s. 522 (1963) 372 u.s. 522 fields et al. v. south carolina. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of south carolina. no. 399. decided march 18, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 240 s. c. 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 126 s. e. 2d 6, 7, 8, 9. jack greenberg, constance baker motley, matthew j. perry and lincoln c. jenkins, jr. for petitioners. daniel r. mcleod, attorney general of south carolina, everett n. brandon, assistant attorney general, and julian s. wolfe for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. the judgment of the.....
Judgment:
FIELDS v. SOUTH CAROLINA - 372 U.S. 522 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court FIELDS v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 372 U.S. 522 (1963) 372 U.S. 522

FIELDS ET AL. v. SOUTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 399.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 240 S. C. 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 126 S. E. 2d 6, 7, 8, 9.

Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Matthew J. Perry and Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr. for petitioners.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, and Julian S. Wolfe for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of South Carolina is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK dissents for the reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in Edwards v. South Carolina, supra.

Page 372 U.S. 522, 523




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //