Skip to content


Birmingham Ice and Cold Storage Vs. Southern Railway - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 524
AppellantBirmingham Ice and Cold Storage
RespondentSouthern Railway
Excerpt:
birmingham ice & cold storage v. southern railway - 372 u.s. 524 (1963) u.s. supreme court birmingham ice & cold storage v. southern railway, 372 u.s. 524 (1963) 372 u.s. 524 birmingham ice & cold storage co. et al. v. southern railway co. et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of alabama. no. 425. decided march 18, 1963. appeal dismissed. reported below: 205 f. supp. 640. david j. vann and a. alvis layne for appellants. jos. f. johnston for southern railway co. et al., and james w. wrape and glenn m. elliott for jefferson warehouse & cold storage co. et al., appellees. solicitor general cox filed a memorandum for the united states. per curiam. the motions to.....
Judgment:
BIRMINGHAM ICE & COLD STORAGE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY - 372 U.S. 524 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court BIRMINGHAM ICE & COLD STORAGE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY, 372 U.S. 524 (1963) 372 U.S. 524

BIRMINGHAM ICE & COLD STORAGE CO. ET AL. v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ALABAMA. No. 425.
Decided March 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 205 F. Supp. 640.

David J. Vann and A. Alvis Layne for appellants.

Jos. F. Johnston for Southern Railway Co. et al., and James W. Wrape and Glenn M. Elliott for Jefferson Warehouse & Cold Storage Co. et al., appellees.

Solicitor General Cox filed a memorandum for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 372 U.S. 524, 525




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //