Skip to content


White Stag Manufacturing Co. Vs. Ellis - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 251
AppellantWhite Stag Manufacturing Co.
RespondentEllis
Excerpt:
white stag manufacturing co. v. ellis - 372 u.s. 251 (1963) u.s. supreme court white stag manufacturing co. v. ellis, 372 u.s. 251 (1963) 372 u.s. 251 white stag manufacturing co. v. ellis et al., members of the state tax commission of oregon. appeal from the supreme court of oregon. no. 708. decided february 25, 1963. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 232 ore. 94, 373 p.2d 999. walter h. evans, jr. for appellant. robert y. thornton, attorney general of oregon, and carlisle b. roberts and gerald f. bartz, assistant attorneys general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of.....
Judgment:
WHITE STAG MANUFACTURING CO. v. ELLIS - 372 U.S. 251 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court WHITE STAG MANUFACTURING CO. v. ELLIS, 372 U.S. 251 (1963) 372 U.S. 251

WHITE STAG MANUFACTURING CO. v. ELLIS ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE STATE TAX
COMMISSION OF OREGON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON. No. 708.
Decided February 25, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 232 Ore. 94, 373 P.2d 999.

Walter H. Evans, Jr. for appellant.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Carlisle B. Roberts and Gerald F. Bartz, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


PATTERSON v. CITY OF DALLAS, <a href="/100691"> 372 U.S. 251 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 251 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court PATTERSON v. CITY OF DALLAS, 372 U.S. 251 (1963) 372 U.S. 251

PATTERSON ET AL. v. CITY OF DALLAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 712.
Decided February 25, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 355 S. W. 2d 838.

Robert C. Cox for appellants.

H. P. Kucera and Ted P. MacMaster for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 372 U.S. 251, 252




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //