Skip to content


Sheldon Vs. Fannin - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number372 U.S. 228
AppellantSheldon
RespondentFannin
Excerpt:
sheldon v. fannin - 372 u.s. 228 (1963) u.s. supreme court sheldon v. fannin, 372 u.s. 228 (1963) 372 u.s. 228 sheldon et al. v. fannin et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of arizona. no. 656. decided february 18, 1963. appeal dismissed. reported below: 214 f. supp. 940. hayden c. covington for appellants. robert w. pickrell, attorney general of arizona, and frank sagarino, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. page 372 u.s. 228, 229
Judgment:
SHELDON v. FANNIN - 372 U.S. 228 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court SHELDON v. FANNIN, 372 U.S. 228 (1963) 372 U.S. 228

SHELDON ET AL. v. FANNIN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA.
No. 656.
Decided February 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: 214 F. Supp. 940.

Hayden C. Covington for appellants.

Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Frank Sagarino, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Page 372 U.S. 228, 229




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //