Skip to content


independent Petroleum Workers, America, Vs. American Oil - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number379 U.S. 130
Appellantindependent Petroleum Workers, America,
RespondentAmerican Oil
Excerpt:
.....oil - 379 u.s. 130 (1964) u.s. supreme court independent petroleum workers, america, v. american oil, 379 u.s. 130 (1964) 379 u.s. 130 independent petroleum workers of america, inc. v. american oil co. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit. no. 55. argued november 9, 1964. decided november 23, 1964. 324 f.2d 903 , affirmed by an equally divided court. david e. feller argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs were william belshaw, benedict r. danko, elliot bredhoff, jerry d. anker and michael h. gottesman. frederic d. anderson argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief were richard p. tinkham and daniel f. kelly. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally.....
Judgment:
INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS, AMERICA, v. AMERICAN OIL - 379 U.S. 130 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS, AMERICA, v. AMERICAN OIL, 379 U.S. 130 (1964) 379 U.S. 130

INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS OF AMERICA, INC. v. AMERICAN OIL CO.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 55.
Argued November 9, 1964.
Decided November 23, 1964.

324 F.2d 903 , affirmed by an equally divided Court.

David E. Feller argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William Belshaw, Benedict R. Danko, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker and Michael H. Gottesman.

Frederic D. Anderson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard P. Tinkham and Daniel F. Kelly.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 379 U.S. 130, 131




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //